A Competent Astrological Study

Please look at this document:
http://cura.free.fr/gauq/11gdcura.html#**

This link starts you with the English intro., which is half-way down the document. If you are interested in specifics, you can scroll up to the top, where you will find links to specific birth data, in 15,943 cases.

I think this study is rather unassailable, from any point of view.

Om Tryamnbakam Yajamahe viveshwar

Well, what about them? Where are they? I think the reason no one has replicated his work is that no one had any reason to doubt it, and no way to prove anything but what he proved. You can't make a career simply by proving what is already proven.

What we've had since then are straw-man studies such as the recent one, in which the hypothesis had nothing to do either with the astrological implications of the births involved, or with the way astrology is actually practiced.

Om Tryambakam Yajamahe viveshwar

This is Gauquelin's study from over 30 years ago. Why hasn't any scientist been able to replicate his findings since then? Doesn't it seem striking to you that there was one seemingly positive study from so long ago and none since then?

What about studies that call it into question? What about ones that use much larger groups and find no correlation?

Are you deliberately stupid, or do you rehearse.

IN case you are still unable to understand, Larger studies, and other studies showed Gaugelin to be sadly wrong, and didn't hold up.

Another respondent has, I be;eive put up the studies. Of course, since it's *science*, you will ignore it.

however, here's some more:
http://www.skepsis.nl/mars.html
http://www.scientificexploration.org/jse/abstracts/ v11n1a2.html (and the article was co-authored by an Indian.